After having been the leader of Ansar al-Islam, having threatened Norway with revenge in form of terrorist acts in case he will be expelled, and having publicly declared his support for Osama bin Laden and his war against western civilization, it is amusing that Mullah Krekar got the nerve to claim any rights at all. And in response to his victimizing of himself in this respect; of course it is reasonable to label him as a threat to the state.
In any state, its members (which by I mean the people living in it, including refugees, e.g. Mullah Krekar) has got certain rights and certain obligations. One of the most basic obligations, of course, is not to harm or destroy the society in which you live. If you cannot even fulfill this obligation, how can you even think of claiming to have any rights in this society? Can you really expect the state to do anything for you then? Personally, I don`t think so.So in Mullah Krekar`s case the Norwegian state has more than given him his rights. The main reason for not expelling Mullah Krekar is that Iraq will not give any promise that Krekar will not be tortured or killed if he returns to Iraq. Thus, the Norwegian state cannot expell him.
This threat of being tortured or killed if he returns, is something that Mullah Krekar seems to have an on-and-off fear of. It is not, it seems, his main concern when he goes on holiday to Iraq. When he is in Norway, though, it seems to be a very overhanging danger that he will be tortured and killed if he returns..

No comments:
Post a Comment